BS IEC 62483:2013
$198.66
Environmental acceptance requirements for tin whisker susceptibility of tin and tin alloy surface finishes on semiconductor devices
Published By | Publication Date | Number of Pages |
BSI | 2013 | 52 |
IEC 62483:2013 describes the methodology applicable for environmental acceptance testing of tin-based surface finishes and mitigation practices for tin whiskers on semiconductor devices. This methodology may not be sufficient for applications with special requirements, (i.e. military, aerospace, etc.). Additional requirements may be specified in the appropriate requirements (procurement) documentation. This first edition is based on JEDEC documents JESD201A and JESD22-A121A and replaces IEC/PAS 62483, published in 2006. This first edition constitutes a technical revision. This edition includes the following significant technical changes with respect to the previous edition: a) The content of IEC/PAS 62483 was added to the content of JESD201A as Annex A. b) A methodology was introduced for environmental acceptance testing of tin-based surface finishes and mitigation practices for tin whiskers. c) A Clause 6 was introduced detailing the reporting requirements of test results.
PDF Catalog
PDF Pages | PDF Title |
---|---|
4 | English CONTENTS |
10 | 1 Scope 2 Terms and definitions Figures Figure 1 – Cross-sectional view of component surface finishes |
12 | Figure 2 – Typical photographs of termination corrosion |
14 | Figure 3 – Examples of tin whiskers |
15 | Figure 4 – Non-whisker surface formations Figure 5 – Whisker length measurement |
16 | 3 Test method for measuring tin whisker growth 3.1 Procedure 3.2 Test samples Figure 6 – Minimum lead-to-lead gap |
17 | 3.3 Handling precaution 3.4 Reflow assembly |
18 | 4 Acceptance procedure for tin and tin alloy surface finishes 4.1 Determination of whether a technology, manufacturing process, or similarity acceptance test is required Tables Table 1 – SMT board assembly process guidance for minimum termination wetting |
19 | Figure 7 – Flowchart to determine whether a technology acceptance test,a manufacturing process acceptance test or no testing is requiredon the basis of similarity |
20 | Figure 8 – Technology acceptance test flow for multi-leaded components using copperalloy leadframe with post bake mitigation technology – Surface finish test sample,technology parameters fixed (1 of 2) |
21 | Figure 8 (2 of 2) |
22 | Table 2 – Surface finish technology andmanufacturing process change acceptance parameters |
23 | Table 3 – Tin and tin alloy surface finish acceptance test matrix |
24 | 4.2 Samples 4.2.1 Sample requirements 4.2.2 Sample size for multi-leaded components with 5 or more leads 4.2.3 Sample size for passive and discrete components with 4 leads or fewer 4.2.4 Additional samples |
25 | 4.3 Test procedures and durations 4.3.1 Preconditioning Table 4 – Tin and tin alloy surface finish acceptance test sample sizerequirements per precondition treatment for multi-leaded component Table 5 – Tin and tin alloy surface finish acceptance test sample size requirements perprecondition treatment for passive and discrete components with 4 leads or fewer |
26 | 4.3.2 Test conditions 4.3.3 Test durations 4.3.4 Whisker inspection 4.3.5 Surface corrosion observed during high temperature/humidity testing |
27 | Table 6 – Technology acceptance tests and durations |
28 | Table 7 – Manufacturing process change acceptance tests and durations |
29 | 4.4 Determination of the class level for testing Table 8 – Preconditioning for technology/ manufacturingprocess change acceptance testing |
30 | 5 Acceptance criteria 5.1 General 5.2 Through-hole lead termination exclusions |
31 | 6 Reporting of results 6.1 General requirements Table 9 – Technology acceptance criteria for maximum allowable tin whisker length Table 10 – Manufacturing process change acceptancecriteria for maximum allowable tin whisker length |
32 | 6.2 Description of the surface finish, defined by technology and process parameters in Table 2 6.3 Samples and preconditioning 6.4 Acceptance testing 7 On-going tin whisker evaluation |
34 | Annex A (normative) Test method for measuring whisker growth on tin and tin alloy surface finishes of semiconductor devices A.1 Overview A.2 Disclaimer |
35 | Figure A.1 – Process flow for Sn whisker testing |
36 | A.3 Apparatus A.3.1 Temperature cycling chambers A.3.2 Temperature humidity chambers A.3.3 Optical stereomicroscope (optional) A.3.4 Optical microscope (optional) A.3.5 Scanning electron microscope A.3.6 Convection reflow oven (optional) |
37 | A.4 Validation of optical microscopy equipment A.4.1 Overall criteria A.4.2 Capability of whisker detection |
38 | A.4.3 Capability of whisker length measurement A.4.4 Capability of whisker density measurement A.5 Sample requirements and optional preconditioning A.5.1 Acceptance requirements |
39 | A.5.2 Scientific studies A.5.3 Test coupons A.5.4 Optional test sample preconditioning |
40 | Table A.2 – Optional preconditioning treatments for tin whisker test samples Table A.3 – Optional preconditioning reflow profiles |
41 | A.6 Whisker inspection, length measurement and test conditions A.6.1 General principles A.6.2 Handling A.6.3 General inspection instructions Figure A.2 – Optional preconditioning reflow profile |
42 | A.6.4 Initial pretest inspection A.6.5 Test conditions Figure A.3 – Examples of whiskers in areas of corrosion Table A.4 – Tin whisker test conditions |
43 | A.6.6 Screening inspection A.6.7 Detailed inspection |
44 | Figure A.4 – A schematic diagram depicting a component lead and the top,2 sides, and bends of the lead to be inspected Figure A.5 – A schematic drawing depicting a leadless componentand the top and 3 sides of the terminations to be inspected Figure A.6 – A schematic drawing depicting one possible couponand three 1,7 mm2 areas identified for inspection |
45 | A.6.8 Recording procedure for scientific studies Table A.5 – Tin whisker tests standard report formats (general information) |
47 | Table A.6 – Tin whisker tests standard report formats (detailed whisker information) |
48 | Table A.7 – Whisker density ranges that can be determined based onthe number of whiskers observed per lead, termination, or coupon area |
49 | Bibliography |