ASME PTC PM 10:2010 Edition
$98.04
ASME PTC PM Performance Monitoring Guidelines for Power Plants
Published By | Publication Date | Number of Pages |
ASME | 2010 | 248 |
PDF Catalog
PDF Pages | PDF Title |
---|---|
9 | FOREWORD |
10 | COMMITTEE ROSTER |
12 | CORRESPONDENCE WITH THE PTC PM COMMITTEE |
13 | INTRODUCTION |
15 | Section 1 Fundamental Concepts 1- 1 OBJECT AND SCOPE 1- 2 OVERVIEW |
19 | FIGURES Fig. 1-2.6-1 Typical Plant Losses |
20 | Fig. 1-2.6-2 Typical Losses for a Gas-TurbineāBased Combined Cycle Plant |
21 | Fig. 1-2-6-3 Heat Balance for Turbine Cycle… |
22 | Fig. 1-2.6-4 Mass Flows Through Steam and Feedwater System for TypicalPressurized Water Reactor Plant Fig. 1-2.6-5 Energy Distribution for a Typical Pressurized Water Reactor Nuclear Plant Fig. 1-2.6-5 Energy Distribution for a Typical Pressurized Water Reactor Nuclear Plant |
23 | Fig. 1-2.6-6 Typical Boiler Losses |
24 | Fig. 1-2.6-7 Typical Cycle Losses |
25 | Fig. 1-2.6-8 Typical Turbine/Generator Losses TABLES Table 1-2.6-1 Off-Design Conditions’ Approximate Effect on Actual Heat Rate |
26 | Fig. 1-2.6-9 Computed Variation of Unburned Carbon With Excess Air Table 1-2.6-2 Value of Turbine Section Efficiency Level Improvementon a Unit Heat Rate of 10,000 Btu/kWh |
27 | Fig. 1-2.6-10 Effect of O2 and Coal Fineness on Unit Heat Rate Fig. 1-2.6-11 Effect of Stack Gas Temperature on Unit Heat Rate |
28 | Fig. 1-2.6-12 Boiler Loss Optimization Table 1-2.6-3 Sensitivity of Heat Rate to Various Parameters for a Typical Pressurized WaterReactor Nuclear Power Plant |
31 | 1- 3 DEFINITIONS AND DESCRIPTION OF TERMS |
36 | Section 2 Program Implementation 2- 1 PROGRAM PLANNING |
47 | 2- 2 INSTRUMENTATION |
51 | Fig. 2-2.3.1-1 Primary Flow Section for Welded Assembly Fig. 2-2.3.1-2 Inspection Port |
54 | Fig. 2-2.4-1 Basic Pressure Terms From ASME PTC 19.2 Fig. 2-2.4-2 General Uncertainties of Pressure-MeasuringDevices From PTC 6 Report |
56 | Fig. 2-2.4.5-1 Effect of Pressure and Bias Errors on HP Turbine Efficiency |
57 | Fig. 2-2.4.5-2 Effect of Pressure and Bias Errors on IP Turbine Efficiency |
58 | Fig. 2-2.5.1-1 TC Drift Study of Six Thermocouples Cycled 210 days to 300 days |
59 | Fig. 2-2.5.2-1 Drift of Ice Point Resistance of 102 RTDs Cycled 810 days |
60 | Fig. 2-2.5.3-1 Effect of Temperature Bias and Error on HP Turbine Efficiency Fig. 2-2.5.3-2 Effect of Temperature Bias and Error on IP Turbine Efficiency |
72 | 2- 3 PERFORMANCE MONITORING IMPLEMENTATION AND DIAGNOSTICS |
76 | Table 2-3.6.2.2-1 Diagnostic Chart of Turbine Loss Characteristics |
77 | Fig. 2-3.6.2.1-1 Performance Curves to Characterize BoilerLosses ā Example for a Coal-Fired Unit Table 2-3.6.2.2-2 Steam Surface Condenser Diagnostics |
78 | Fig. 2-3.6.2.3-1 Heat Rate Logic Tree ā Main Diagram |
79 | Fig. 2-3.6.2.3-2 Illustration of Decision Tree Concept for Investigating PerformanceParameter Deviations |
95 | Fig. 2-3.8.4.1-1 Pulverizer Capacity Curve |
96 | Fig. 2-3.8.4.1-2 Arrangement for Sampling Pulverized Coal |
97 | Fig. 2-3.8.4.1-3 Graphical Form for Representing Distribution of Sizes of Broken Coal |
103 | Fig. 2-3.8.6.1-1 Sampling Direct-Fired Pulverized Coal-Sampling Stations |
119 | Fig. 2-3.9.4.3-1 Typical DCA and TTD Versus Internal Liquid Level |
138 | Table 2-3.16-1 Matrix of Cycle Interrelations |
145 | 2-4 INCREMENTAL HEAT RATE Fig. 2-4.2-1 Input/Output Curves for the Two Typical Thermal Units |
146 | Fig. 2-4.2-2 Input/Output Relationships for a2 Ćā 1 Combined Cycle Facility Fig. 2-4.2-3 Incremental Heat Rate for Steam Turbine WithSequential Valve Operation |
147 | Table 2-4.3-1 Incremental Rates for the Two Generating Units in Fig. 2-4.2-1 |
148 | Table 2-4.3-2 Relative Incremental Costs Associated With a Combined Cycle Facility |
149 | Fig. 2-4.3.1-1 Optimum Load Division by Equal Incremental Heat Rate Table 2-4.3.1-1 Impact of Load Division on Plant Economy |
151 | Fig. 2-4.4-1 Example of Heat Rate Not Monotonically Increasing in a 2 Ćā 1 Configuration |
152 | Fig. 2-4.4-2 Incremental Curve Shape |
153 | Fig. 2-4.4-3 Illustration of Development of Incremental Heat Rate InformationFrom Basic Plant Measurements |
155 | Fig. 2-4.4-4 Heat Rate and Incremental Heat Rate Versus LoadFossil Unit Fig. 2-4.4-5 Heat Rate and Incremental Heat Rate Versus LoadBias Error |
156 | Fig. 2-4.4-6 Heat Rate and Incremental Heat Rate Versus LoadCombined Bias and Random Error |
158 | Fig. 2-4.6.1-1 Combined Cycle Heat Rates Versus Ambient Temperature Fig. 2-4.6.2-1 Combined Cycle Input/Output Relationships |
159 | 2-5 PERFORMANCE OPTIMIZATION Fig. 2-4.6.2-2 Combined Cycle Incremental Heat RatesVersus Ambient Temperature |
191 | Section 3 Case Studies/ Diagnostic Examples 3- 1 AIR HEATER PLUGGING DUE TO FAILED SOOTBLOWER Fig. 3-1.1-1 Air Heater Exit Gas Temperature 2-Week Trend |
192 | Fig. 3-1.3-1 Air Heater Differential Pressure 2-Week Trends |
193 | 3-2 BOILER EXAMPLE |
194 | 3-3 TEMPERATURE CALIBRATIONS |
195 | Fig. 3-3.2-1 Three RTDs: Readings Collected at Five Temperatures |
196 | Fig. 3-3.2-2 Fit of RTD Data Fig. 3-3.2-3 Histogram of RTD A Fig. 3-3.2-4 Distribution of Errors for the Three RTDs |
197 | Fig. 3-3.2-5 Fits of RTDs A, B, and C in Open Circuit Fig. 3-3.2-6 Fits of RTDs A, B, and C Using the CalendarāVan DusenEq. (3-3.2) for Calibration |
198 | 3-4 CAPACITY LOSS INVESTIGATION DUE TO FOULING OF FEED WATERFLOW NOZZLE (NUCLEAR PLANT) Fig. 3-3.3-1 Fits With and Without Replicate Data |
200 | Fig. 3-4.1.1-1 Logic for Tree Case Study |
201 | Fig. 3-4.1.2-1 Decision Tree for Capacity Loss… |
202 | Fig. 3-4.1.3-1 Power design Heat Balance… |
203 | 3-5 UNIT CAPACITY AND ID FAN CAPACITY DUE TO AIR HEATER LEAKAGE Table 3-5.2-1 Air Heater Leakage |
204 | Fig. 3-5.2-1 Flue Gas Analyzer Measurements at Locations Along the Gas Path |
205 | 3-6 LOSS OF EXTRACTION FLOW Fig. 3-6.3-1 Generator-Output and Heat Rate Deviation |
206 | Fig. 3-6.3-2 Change in Performance Profile Over Significant Cycle Positions |
207 | 3-7 QUESTION AND ANSWER SESSION:A NUCLEAR PLANT DIAGNOSTIC PROBLEM Fig. 3-7-1 Variations of Fourth-Stage Pressure |
208 | Fig. 3-7-2 Similarities Between Predicted and Measured Pressure Changes |
209 | 3- 8 APPLICATION OF TURBINE TEST DATA FOR PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION |
210 | 3-9 CONDENSER TUBE FOULING PROBLEM Fig. 3-8.3-1 Turbine Pressure Profiles |
213 | 3- 10 FEEDWATER PARTITION- PLATE BYPASS PROBLEM Table 3-10.1-1 Test Results of Four High-Pressure Heaters |
214 | 3-11 AIR-HEATER PLUGGAGE PROBLEM |
215 | 3-12 DEPOSITS IN HIGH-PRESSURE TURBINE |
216 | 3- 13 PULVERIZER COAL- MILL FINENESS PROBLEM Table 3-12.2-1 Reconciliation of Load Change Based on Change in Performance Parameters |
217 | Fig. 3-13.3-1 Adjusted Inverted Cone Table 3-13.3-1 Measurements Taken at the Outage |
218 | Table 3-13.3-2 Calculated Cone and Feedpipe Areas Table 3-13.3-3 Resulting Gap Clearances and Areas |
219 | NONMANDATORY APPENDIX A THERMODYNAMICS FUNDAMENTALS |